Abortion training in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in a post-Dobbs era.

OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires all obstetrics and gynecology residents have access to abortion training. The impact of Dobbs on training remains unknown. We aimed to describe residency programs affected by abortion bans and those lacking abortion training despite permissive state policies. We considered demographic data to understand the impacts on residents under-represented in medicine. STUDY DESIGN: We used residency databases and websites to abstract data. We identified programs offering routine abortion training as either those with Ryan Programs or those with website or email acknowledgment of training. We defined states with abortion bans as those with either complete or 6-week bans as of December 2022. We used χ2 and Student's t tests in descriptive analyses and performed a logistic regression to adjust for demographic and program-specific variables. RESULTS: Of 286 residency programs included, 140 (49%) offered routine abortion training prior to Dobbs. As of December 2022, 19 of these (14%) had lost the ability to provide routine in-state abortion training. Of 223 residency programs in states with legal abortion, 102 (46%) programs lacked routine abortion training. These sites were more likely to be community or community-university programs, with graduates more likely to practice as generalists. Resident race/ethnicity did not differ between residents in states with legal abortion vs abortion bans. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in states with legal abortion do not appear to provide routine abortion training. Further work is needed to understand this paucity of training and maximize access in legislatively permissible environments. IMPLICATIONS: Following Dobbs, 14% of residency programs lost in-state abortion training. Notably, in states with legal abortion, 46% of programs lack routine abortion training despite permissive legislation. This presents a window of opportunity for expansion of abortion training, particularly at community and community-university hybrid residency sites.

Understanding pre-residency abortion training pathways and career choices in the United States: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Many factors contribute to the decision to provide abortion in the United States. We aim to describe pre-residency experiences and decisions that contribute to choosing a career as an abortion provider in the United States. METHODS: We conducted 60-min semi-structured telephone interviews with 34 current abortion care providers about their career trajectories, decision-making and planning. Interviews were transcribed and coded by three members of the research team using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A majority of the participants considered (73.5%, n=25) and firmly committed (62.8%, n=22) to providing abortion care prior to entering residency. They described important professional experiences with women's health and reproductive rights, as well as personal experiences with abortion care, all of which inspired them to seek out abortion training during medical school and residency. Participants also described a dearth of mentors or role models until late in training, especially for family physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the decision to provide abortion care is often made prior to residency training, before or during medical school, so additional support may be needed to promote exposure to abortion care during undergraduate medical education or even before. Further, there is a need for improved mentorship and role modelling during these periods, especially for family physicians. This may be especially critical after the overturn of Roe v Wade, as medical schools in restrictive states may not be able to provide abortions to patients, depriving students of role models who are abortion providers.

The association between abortion training and obstetrics and gynecology resident competence and intention to provide abortion care before Dobbs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of abortion training in fourth-year obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents' abortion care competence and practice intentions before the Dobbs decision. STUDY DESIGN: This is a planned secondary analysis of survey data of fourth-year U.S. OBGYN residents. Abortion training was defined as 'routine' if automatically included in schedules, ''optional'' if not scheduled but available, and ''not available''. Self-assessed competence was defined as feeling prepared to independently provide care. Participants were asked about their competence and post-residency intentions to provide specific aspects of pregnancy loss and induced abortion care. RESULTS: Of 1241 fourth-year residents, 885 (71%) completed the questions of interest. For each skill, more residents with routine training reported competence compared to those with less comprehensive training. More residents with routine training reported intentions to include abortion care in practice (422, 79%) compared to residents with optional (171, 66%) or no training (51, 55%), p < 0.001). Residents with routine training were nearly six times more likely to intend to provide medication abortion post-residency compared to residents without training; more residents in all groups reported intentions to provide care for pregnancy loss compared to abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-Dobbs, residents with routine abortion training had greater self-assessed competence in abortion care than those with optional or no training and were more likely to intend to provide this after residency. Given the evolving impacts of the 2022 reversal of Roe v Wade, residency training programs must work to ensure routine access to legally permissible abortion training as routine training is associated with intention to provide fundamental, reproductive healthcare. IMPLICATIONS: Routine training in abortion care during OBGYN residency is associated with higher competence and intention to provide post-residency - availability of this training Is severely compromised in restricted states post-Dobbs.

Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs.

In June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, opening the door to state-level abortion bans. By August 2023, 17 states banned abortion or instituted early gestational age bans. We performed an analysis to assess the proportion of accredited US family medicine residency programs and trainees in states with abortion restrictions. Twenty-nine percent of family medicine residency programs (n = 201) and residents (n = 3,930) are in states with bans or very restrictive policies. Family medicine residency programs must optimize training and exposure to abortion within their contexts, so graduates are able to care for patients seeking abortions or needing follow-up care.

The APGO Academic Scholars and Leaders Program: Supporting obstetrics and gynecology faculty development for 20 years.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the impacts of the Academic Scholars and Leaders (ASL) Program in achieving 3 key objectives: treatment of education as a scholarly pursuit, improved education leadership, and career advancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on the twenty-year experience of the ASL Program-a national, longitudinal faculty development program of the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology (APGO) covering instruction, curriculum development/program evaluation, assessment/feedback, leadership/professional development, and educational scholarship. We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of ASL participants who graduated in 1999-2017. We sought evidence of impact using Kirkpatrick's 4-level framework. Descriptive quantitative data were analyzed, and open-ended comments were organized using content analysis. RESULTS: 64% (260) of graduates responded. The vast majority (96%) felt the program was extremely worthwhile (Kirkpatrick level 1). Graduates cited learned skills they had applied to their work, most commonly curricular development (48%) and direct teaching (38%) (Kirkpatrick 2&3 A). Since participation, 82% of graduates have held institutional, education-focused leadership roles (Kirkpatrick 3B). Nineteen percent had published the ASL project as a manuscript and 46% additional education papers (Kirkpatrick 3B). CONCLUSIONS: The APGO ASL program has been associated with successful outcomes in treatment of education as a scholarly pursuit, education leadership, and career advancement. Going forward, APGO is considering ways to diversify the ASL community and to support educational research training.

Sexual and reproductive health teaching in undergraduate medical education: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: Contraception use, undesired pregnancy, and abortion care are common medical experiences that most physicians will encounter for their patients. Future physicians should therefore have some formal education on these topics. In this narrative review, we focused on how medical education approaches these sometimes polarizing yet fundamental topics. METHODS: We assessed the published literature on sexual and reproductive health education in undergraduate medical education from 2000 to 2021, screening 868 articles and including 52 articles. We included articles that discussed contraception, emergency contraception, pregnancy options counseling, abortion, and ethics related to sexual and reproductive health. RESULTS: Included studies came from 14 countries and described both preclinical and clinical education. Studies assessed medical student knowledge, the effectiveness of educational interventions and medical school faculty perspectives on sexual and reproductive health curricula. Medical educators have employed a variety of approaches to teach sexual and reproductive health including simulation, objective structured clinical examinations, team-based learning, narrative medicine, online modules, and flipped classrooms. CONCLUSION: Students generally received sexual and reproductive health education favorably, demonstrating increased knowledge and comfort with these topics after an education session. Studies also identified curricular gaps and deficiencies in student knowledge, which may indicate a need for improved and consistent medical school education on contraception and abortion.

Pregnancy Conceptualizations in Women Who Have Had Recent Bariatric Surgery.

Objectives: To describe bariatric surgery patients' perioperative conceptualizations about pregnancy. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study performed in 2016, evaluating a nationally recruited convenience sample of U.S. women aged 18-45 years who underwent bariatric surgery within the past 24 months. We assessed four pregnancy constructs: intent, desire, emotional orientation, and importance to avoid. We examined relationships between constructs, with time since surgery, postoperative pregnancy, and contraceptive use using descriptive statistics. Results: We included 363 eligible women (response rate 80%). Participant median age was 36 years, 71% (n = 258) were White, 77% (n = 279) were sexually active at the time of the study, and 39% (n = 140) experienced preoperative infertility. Most reported no desire to become pregnant (59%, n = 175) and that it was important to avoid pregnancy (78%, n = 283) within the first 24 months after surgery. Relationships between constructs were complex. Respondents in their first postoperative year more likely reported they would feel upset about a hypothetical pregnancy (40%, n = 74) than those in their second year (27%, n = 48, p = 0.02). Of those with a postoperative pregnancy, 46% (n = 17) felt it was important to avoid pregnancy compared with 81% (n = 266) of those who did not have a pregnancy (p < 0.001). Most used postoperative contraception (66%, n = 241), and those who felt it was important to avoid pregnancy more likely used contraception (82%, n = 197) than those who did not feel it was important (18%, n = 44, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Women undergoing bariatric surgery have diverse and complex conceptualizations about future pregnancy. These varied based on time from surgery and influenced postoperative contraceptive use.

Now is the time to stand up for reproductive justice and abortion access.

The ongoing assault on abortion care in the United States culminating in the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v Wade calls for concerted national action to address the major gaps in care and training that will ensue. We write this call to action to our community of obstetrician-gynecologists to prioritize advocacy for access to abortion care. Professional health organizations understand the importance of access to contraception and abortion care as the foundation for reproductive health, autonomy, and empowerment. As restrictions proliferate, patients are encountering significant challenges in accessing care; all in our community who provide obstetrical and gynecologic care need to step up to ensure adequate and equitable patient care and provider training. In this Clinical Opinion, we outline current professional organization evidence-based support for comprehensive reproductive health care including abortion care, without interference by politics, strategies to proactively prevent further restrictions, and actions to mitigate the harm that will be caused by further restrictions to abortion care. We must all speak up, be visible in our support, and take any and every opportunity to advocate for abortion care as an integral part of comprehensive reproductive medical care.

Understanding the role of race in abortion stigma in the United States: a systematic scoping review.

The impact of abortion stigma is broad. Stigma impacts abortion providers, abortion patients and the broader community. Understanding how race and culture affect aspects of abortion stigma may be an important piece of expanding access to and support of abortion. We conducted a systematic search for studies involving abortion stigma and race in PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, GenderWatch and Ethnic NewsWatch on 7 January 2020. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they explored stigma and included participant race and/or ethnicity, were in English, and included original research. Thirty studies were included in the final review, including 11 quantitative studies, 9 qualitative studies, 4 mixed methods studies and 6 dissertations. Most studies provided basic racial and demographic data but did not provide racial differences in experiences of abortion stigma. Three quantitative studies found that women of colour had different experiences of abortion stigma compared to White women. Non-peer-reviewed studies of qualitative PhD-level dissertation research found that race, culture, religion and immigration had unique and complex effects on abortion stigma experienced by Latinx women. While abortion stigma is common, we found that there is a lack of research contextualising the racialisation of the United States. Quantitative studies found that women of colour experience abortion stigma at lower levels compared to White women. However, qualitative analyses of experiences suggest that quantitative measures of abortion stigma may not capture unique aspects of abortion stigma as experienced by women of colour.

Implications of the Dobbs Decision for Medical Education: Inadequate Training and Moral Distress.

This Viewpoint discusses how states' restrictions on abortion will affect medical students' training in providing reproductive health care and also create moral distress by being forced to provide care that may harm patients.

Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.

In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, a direct challenge to Roe v Wade. A detailed policy analysis by the Guttmacher Institute projects that, if Roe v Wade is overturned, 21 states are certain to ban abortion and five states are likely to ban abortion. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires access to abortion training for all obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. We performed a comprehensive study of all accredited U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs to assess how many of these programs and trainees are currently located in states projected to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. We found that, of 286 accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs with current residents, 128 (44.8%) are in states certain or likely to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. Therefore, of 6,007 current obstetrics and gynecology residents, 2,638 (43.9%) are certain or likely to lack access to in-state abortion training. Preparation for the reversal of Roe v Wade should include not only a recognition of the negative effects on patient access to abortion care in affected states, but also of the dramatic implications for obstetrics and gynecology residency training.

Work-arounds at faith-based obstetrics and gynecology residency programs to accomplish family planning training.

OBJECTIVE: To explore work-arounds at faith-based obstetrics and gynecology residency programs to accomplish family planning training. STUDY DESIGN: We invited educational stakeholders to participate in telephone interviews that elicited strategies for overcoming barriers to family planning training in religious settings. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 30 invited programs leaders participated. Work-arounds included reliance on non-contraceptive indications for contraception and permanent contraception provision, obtaining ethics committee approvals for service provision, and developing partnerships with offsite centers for training. CONCLUSION: Ob-gyn residency programs affiliated with religious hospitals utilize various work-arounds for family planning training and patient care. These findings may inform other programs that face similar barriers, secondary to institutional or governmental restrictions.

Toward the elimination of race-based medicine: replace race with racism as preeclampsia risk factor.

Pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality continue to disproportionately affect birthing people who identify as Black. The use of race-based risk factors in medicine exacerbates racial health inequities by insinuating a false conflation that fails to consider the underlying impact of racism. As we work toward health equity, we must remove race as a risk factor in our guidelines to address disparities due to racism. This includes the most recent US Preventive Services Taskforce, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine guidelines for aspirin prophylaxis in preeclampsia, where the risk factor for "Black race" should be replaced with "anti-Black racism." In this commentary, we reviewed the evidence that supports race as a sociopolitical construct and the health impacts of racism. We presented a call to action to remove racial determination in the guidelines for aspirin prophylaxis in preeclampsia and more broadly in our practice of medicine.

Professionalism in Family Planning Care Workshop.

INTRODUCTION: When clinicians feel negative emotions toward patients, providinge patient-centered care can be difficult. This can occur in family planning scenarios, such as when a provider is uncomfortable with a patient choosing abortion. The Professionalism in Family Planning Care Workshop (PFPCW), framed around professionalism values, used guided reflection to foster self-awareness and empathy in order to teach future providers to provide patient-centered care. METHODS: In the PFPCW, learners discussed challenging patient interactions and family planning scenarios to develop self-awareness and identify strategies for maintaining therapeutic relationships with patients when they experience negative feelings toward them. We implemented the workshop across the United States and Canada and collected pre- and postsurvey data to evaluate program outcomes at Kirkpatrick evaluation levels of participant reaction and effects on learners' attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 403 participants participated in 27 workshops in which pre- and postworkshop surveys (70% and 46% response rates, respectively) were administered. Sixty-five percent of the participants were residents, and 36% had previously participated in a similar workshop. The majority (92%) rated the PFPCWs as worthwhile. Participants valued the discussion and self-reflection components. Afterward, 23% reported that their attitudes toward caring for people with unintended pregnancy changed to feeling more comfortable. Participants said they would employ self-reflection and empathy in future challenging interactions. DISCUSSION: In this pilot implementation study, our workshop provided learners with strategies for patient-centered care in challenging family planning patient interactions. We are currently modifying the workshop and evaluation program based on feedback.

Residents' Experiences of Negative Emotions toward Patients: Challenges to their Identities.

PhenomenonMedical learners are more likely than practicing physicians to experience negative emotions toward some patients whom they find challenging, and medical students experience such emotions related to their identity as learners. Little is known about experiences of residents, who are further along in their physician identity formation and have greater autonomy and competence. We explored and characterized how residents understand their experiences of the phenomenon of feeling negative emotions toward patients in relation to their identities as residents. Approach: In 2018, 305 final-year obstetrics and gynecology residents were invited to participate in interviews, which we conducted until reaching theoretical sufficiency. In semi-structured interviews conducted by phone, we probed interactions when residents felt negative emotions toward patients, including reasons for their feelings related to their professional identities, strategies, and curricular desires. The authors coded data and identified patterns using thematic analysis. Findings: Nineteen residents were interviewed by phone. Residents experienced negative emotions toward patients because of challenges to their identities as: physicians - wanting respect and specific unexpected patient behaviors; learners - desiring complete autonomy and experiencing challenges with attending physicians; teachers - wanting to be a role model and protect junior learners; and workers - trying to complete tasks. Among the strategies used to manage feelings toward patients, they struggled with "venting", or complaining about patients, which was not always helpful and residents recognized as perceived negatively by students. They desired curricular support for these interactions such as debriefs and other supported reflection, faculty modeling, and communication skills training. Insights: Like medical students and physicians in practice, residents experience negative emotions toward patients, often because of and made more difficult by their identities as physicians, learners, teachers, and workers. Educators should support residents' reflections about these interactions, model compassionate behavior when feeling challenged by patients, and address unhealthy coping strategies.

"We're called upon to be nonjudgmental": A qualitative exploration of United States medical students' discussions of abortion as a reflection of their professionalism.

OBJECTIVES: Medical educators may assess learners' professionalism through clinical scenarios eliciting value conflicts - situations in which an individual's values differ from others' perceived values. We examined the extent to which United States (US) medical students' discussion of abortion highlights their professionalism according to the 6 American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) professionalism competencies. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted anonymous, semistructured qualitative interviews with 74 US medical students applying to OB/GYN residency. Interviews explored attitudes toward abortion and abortion case vignettes. We analyzed interview transcripts using directed content analysis for alignment with the AAMC professionalism competencies: humanism, patient needs superseding self-interest, patient autonomy, physician accountability, sensitivity to diverse populations, and commitment to ethical principles. RESULTS: Students' genders, races, religions, and geographic regions were diverse. Attitudes toward abortion varied, but all students commented on themes related to at least 1 AAMC professionalism competency when discussing abortion care. Statements demonstrating students' humanism, prioritization of patient autonomy, and sense of physician accountability were common. Most comments reflected positive professionalism practices, regardless of personal views on abortion or provision intentions; very few students made statements that were not aligned with the AAMC professionalism competencies. CONCLUSIONS: All students in this study exhibited professionalism when discussing abortion, regardless of personal views on abortion or intention to provide this care. Case-based discussions involving abortion could be used to explore professionalism competencies among medical learners. IMPLICATIONS: Discussing abortion has the potential to elicit values conflict, which enables learners to exhibit professionalism. Case-based abortion education should be included in medical school curricula to measure medical professionalism in future physicians, and to serve as a tool for teaching professionalism in medical school.

Self-reported provision of person-centred maternity care among providers in Kenya and Ghana: scale validation and examination of associated factors.

INTRODUCTION: Person-centred maternity care (PCMC), which refers to care that is respectful and responsive to women's preferences needs, and values, is core to high-quality maternal and child health. Provider-reported PCMC provision is a potentially valid means of assessing the extent of PCMC and contributing factors. Our objectives are to assess the psychometric properties of a provider-reported PCMC scale, and to examine levels and factors associated with PCMC provision. METHODS: We used data from two cross-sectional surveys with 236 maternity care providers from Ghana (n=150) and Kenya (n=86). Analysis included factor analysis to assess construct validity and Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency of the scale; descriptive analysis to assess extent of PCMC and bivariate and multivariable linear regression to examine factors associated with PCMC. FINDINGS: The 9-item provider-reported PCMC scale has high construct validity and reliability representing a unidimensional scale with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.72. The average standardised PCMC score for the combined sample was 66.8 (SD: 14.7). PCMC decreased with increasing report of stress and burnout. Compared with providers with no burnout, providers with burnout had lower average PCMC scores (ß: -7.30, 95% CI:-11.19 to -3.40 for low burnout and ß: -10.86, 95% CI: -17.21 to -4.51 for high burnout). Burnout accounted for over half of the effect of perceived stress on PCMC. CONCLUSION: The provider PCMC scale is a valid and reliable measure of provider self-reported PCMC and highlights inadequate provision of PCMC in Kenya and Ghana. Provider burnout is a key driver of poor PCMC that needs to be addressed to improve PCMC.